January 17, 2021

TerabitWeb Blog

Fascinating Technology and Security Information

Cmd and Conquer: De-DOSfuscation with flare-qdb

8 min read

When Daniel
released his excellent DOSfuscation
paper, I was fascinated to see how tricks I used as a systems engineer
could help attackers evade detection. I didn’t have much to contribute
to this conversation until I had to analyze a hideously obfuscated
batch file as part of my job on the FLARE malware queue.

Previously, I released flare-qdb, which is a
command-line and Python-scriptable debugger based on Vivisect. I
previously wrote
about how to use flare-qdb to instrument and modify malware behavior.
Flare-qdb also made a guest appearance in Austin
and Jacob Christie’s SANS
DFIR Summit 2017 briefing
, inducing the Windows event log
service to exclude process creation events. In this blog post, I will
show how I used flare-qdb to bring “script block logging” to the
Windows command interpreter. I will also share an Easter Egg that I
found by flipping only a single bit in the process address space of
cmd.exe. Finally, I will share the script
that I added to flare-qdb
so you can de-obfuscate malicious
command scripts yourself by executing them (in a safe environment, of
course). But first, I’ll talk about the analysis that led me to this solution.

At First Glance

Figure 1 shows a batch script (MD5 hash
6C8129086ECB5CF2874DA7E0C855F2F6) that has been obfuscated using the
BatchEncryption tool referenced in Daniel Bohannon’s paper. This file
does not appear in VirusTotal as of this writing, but its dropper does
(the MD5 hash is ABD0A49FDA67547639EEACED7955A01A). My goal was to
de-obfuscate this script and report on what the attacker was doing.

Figure 1: Contents of XYNT.bat

This 165k batch file is dropped as C:WindowsTempXYNT.bat and
executed by its dropper. Its commands are built from environment
variable substrings. Figure 2 shows how to use the ECHO command to
decode the first command.

Figure 2: Partial command decoding via
the ECHO command

The script uses hundreds of commands to set environment variables
that are ultimately expanded to de-obfuscate malicious commands. A
tedious approach to de-obfuscating this script would be to de-fang
each command by prepending an ECHO statement to print each
de-obfuscated command to the console. Unfortunately, although the ECHO
command can “decode” each command, BatchEncryption needs the SET
commands to be executed to decode future commands. To decode this
script while allowing the full malicious functionality to run as
expected, you would have to iteratively and carefully echo and
selectively execute a few hundred obfuscated SET commands.

The irony of BatchEncryption is that batch scripts are viewed as
being easy to de-obfuscate, making binary code the safer place to hide
logic from the prying eyes of network defenders. But BatchEncryption
adds a formidable barrier to analysis by its extensive, layered use of
environment variables to rebuild the original commands.

Taking Cmd of the Situation

I decided to see if it would be easier to instrument cmd.exe to log
commands rather than de-obfuscating the script myself. To begin, I
debugged cmd.exe, set a breakpoint on CreateProcessW, and executed a
program from the command prompt. Figure 3 shows the call stack for
CreateProcessW as cmd.exe executes notepad.

Figure 3: Call stack for CreateProcessW
in cmd.exe

Starting from cmd!ExecPgm, I reviewed the disassembly of the above
functions in cmd.exe to trace the origin of the command string up the
call stack. I discovered cmd!Dispatch, which receives not a string but
a structure with pointers to the command, arguments, and any I/O
redirection information (such as redirecting
the standard output or error
streams of a program to a file or
device). Testing revealed that these strings had all their environment
variables expanded, which means we should be able to read the
de-obfuscated commands from here.

Figure 4 is an exploration of this structure in WinDbg after running
the command “echo hai > nul”. This command prints the
word hai to the standard output stream but uses the right-angle
bracket to redirect standard output to the NUL device, which discards
all data. The orange boxes highlight non-null pointers that got my
attention during analysis, and the arrows point to the commands I used
to discover their contents.

Figure 4: Exploring the interesting
pointers in 2nd argument to cmd!Dispatch

Because users can redirect multiple I/O streams in a single command,
cmd.exe represents I/O redirection with a linked list. For example,
the command in Listing 1 shows redirection of standard output (stream
#1 is implicit) to shares.txt and standard error (stream #2 is
explicitly referenced) to errors.txt.

net use > shares.txt

Listing 1: Command-line I/O redirection example

Figure 5 shows the command data structure and the I/O redirection
linked list in block diagram format.

Figure 5: Command data structure diagram

By inspection, I found that cmd!Dispatch is responsible for
executing both shell built-ins and executable programs, so unlike
breaking on CreateProcess, it will not miss commands that do not
result in process creation. Based on these findings, I wrote a
flare-qdb script to parse and dump commands as they are executed.

Introducing De-DOSfuscator

De-DOSfuscator uses flare-qdb and Vivisect to hook the Dispatch
function in cmd.exe and parse commands from memory. The De-DOSfuscator
 runs in a 64-bit Python 2 interpreter and dumps commands to
both the console and a log file. The script comes with the latest
version of flare-qdb and is
installed as a Python entry point named dedosfuscator.exe.

De-DOSfuscator relies on the location of the non-exported Dispatch
function to log commands, and its location varies per system. For
convenience, if an Internet connection is available, De-DOSfuscator
automatically retrieves this function’s offset using Microsoft’s
symbol server. To allow offline use, you can supply the path to a copy
of cmd.exe from your offline machine to the –getoff switch to obtain
this offset. You can then supply that output as the argument to the
–useoff switch in your offline machine to inform De-DOSfuscator where
the function is located. Alternately, you can use De-DOSfuscator with
a downloaded PDB or a local symbol cache containing the correct symbols.

Figure 6 demonstrates getting and using the offset in a single
session. Note that for this to work in an isolated VM, you would
instead specify the path to a copy of the guest’s command interpreter
specific to that VM.

Figure 6: Getting and using offsets and
testing De-DOSfuscator

This works great on the BatchEncrypted script in Figure 1. Let’s
have a look.


Figure 7 shows the log created by De-DOSfuscator after running
XYNT.bat. Hundreds of lines of SET statements progressively build
environment variables for composing further commands. Keen eyes will
also note a misspelling of the endlocal command-line extension keyword.

Figure 7: Beginning of dumped commands

These environment variable manipulations give way to real commands
as shown in Figure 8. One of the script’s first actions is to use
reg.exe to check the NUMBER_OF_PROCESSORS environment variable. This
analysis system only had one vCPU, which can be seen in the set
“a=1” output on line 620. After this, the script executes
goto del, which branches to a batch label that ultimately deletes the
script and other dropped files.

Figure 8: Anti-sandbox measure

This is a batch-oriented spin on a common sandbox evasion trick. It
works because many malware analysis sandboxes run with a single CPU to
minimize hypervisor resources, whereas most modern systems have at
least two CPU cores. Now that we can easily read the script’s
commands, it is trivial to circumvent this evasion by, for example,
increasing the number of vCPUs available to the VM. Figure 9 shows
De-DOSfuscator log after inducing the rest of the code to run.

Figure 9: After circumventing
anti-sandbox measure

XYNT.bat calls a dropped binary to create and start a Windows
service for persistence. The largest dropped binary is a variant of
the XMRig cryptocurrency miner, and many of the services and
executables referenced by the script also appear to be cryptocurrency-related.

Happy Easter

Easter is a long way off, but I must present you with a very early
Easter Egg because it is such a neat little find. During my journey
through cmd.exe, I noticed a variable named fDumpParse having only one
cross-reference that seemed to control an interesting behavior. The
lone cross-reference and the relevant code are shown in Figure 10.
Although fDumpParse is inaccessible anywhere else in the code, it
controls whether a function is called to dump information about the
command that has been parsed.

Figure 10: fDumpParse evaluation and
cross-refs (EDI is NULL)

To experiment with this, you can use De-DOSfuscator’s –fDumpParse
switch. You will then be greeted with a command prompt that is more
transparent about what it has parsed. Figure 11 shows an example along
with a graphical representation of the abstract syntax tree (AST) of
parsed command tokens.

Figure 11: Command interpreter with
fDumpParse set

Microsoft probably inserted the fDumpParse flag so developers could
debug issues with cmd.exe. Unfortunately, as nifty as this is, it has
drawbacks for bulk de-obfuscation:

  • This output is harder to
    read than plain commands, because it dumps the tree in preorder
    traversal rather than inorder
    like it was typed.
  • Output copied from the console may contain extraneous line
    breaks depending on the console host program’s text wrapping
  • Scrolling in the command interpreter to read or
    copy output can be tedious.
  • The console buffer is limited,
    so not everything may be captured.
  • Malicious script authors
    can still use the CLS command to clear the screen and make all the
    fDumpParse output disappear.
  • Gratuitous joining of commands
    with command separators (as found in XYNT.bat) yields unreadable
    ASTs that exceed the console width and wrap around, as in Figure

Figure 12: fDumpParse result exceeding
console width

Consequently, fDumpParse is not ideal for de-obfuscating large,
malicious batch files; however, it is still interesting and useful for
de-obfuscating short scripts or one-off commands. You can get the
offset De-DOSfuscator needs for offline use via –getoff and use it
via –useoff, as with normal operation.

Wrapping Up

I have given you an example of a heavily obfuscated command script
and I have shared a useful tool for de-obfuscating it, along with the
analytical steps that I followed to synthesize it. The De-DOSfuscator
script code
 comes with the latest version of flare-qdb and is
accessible as a script entry point (dedosfuscator.exe) when you
install flare-qdb. It is my hope that this not only helps you to
conveniently analyze malicious batch scripts, but also inspires you to
devise your own creative ways to employ flare-qdb against malware.

Copyright © All rights reserved. | Newsphere by AF themes.