March 3, 2021

TerabitWeb Blog

Fascinating Technology and Security Information

Most Security Pros Are Impacted by Geopolitics

2 min read

Original Post from InfoSecurity Magazine

Most Security Pros Are Impacted by Geopolitics

Two-thirds of cybersecurity professionals have been forced to change where and with whom they do business because of escalating concerns around nation state attacks, according to Tripwire.

The security vendor polled 218 security professionals at the RSA Conference in San Francisco recently and found that geopolitical trends are exerting a surprisingly large influence on their roles.

It reflects an age in which technology providers like Huawei are being branded a security risk because of their links to hostile states, while state-sponsored attackers target both government and private sector organizations to steal sensitive information and cause disruption.

The impact on cybersecurity professionals is only set to increase: 87% claimed that nation-state attacks would increase ahead of geopolitical events in 2019, while over three-quarters (79%) said they are more concerned about state-sponsored cyber activity this year.

Nearly half (48%) of those polled said they believe cybersecurity implications are not taken into serious consideration when geopolitical decisions are made. A further 66% said governments are neglecting cyber versus other elements of national security.

It’s long been the UK government’s aim to make the nation the safest place in the world in which to do business online. That suggests at least that its leaders understand the importance of security at a national level.

However, its National Cyber Security Programme has been hamstrung by poor planning and management, according to the National Audit Office (NAO).

A report produced by the agency earlier this month claimed that the lack of an initial business case meant there was no way to assess whether the £1.9bn of funding was sufficient to meet its 12 strategic objectives.

What’s more, it failed to develop a “robust performance framework” soon enough, meaning that there’s still not enough evidence to prioritize funding on the objectives likely to deliver “the biggest impact, address the greatest needs and deliver best value for money.”

Go to Source

Copyright © All rights reserved. | Newsphere by AF themes.